Tailstrike Serious incident Airbus A340-311 4R-ADA, Tuesday 2 July 2013
ASN logo
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information. If you feel this information is incomplete or incorrect, you can submit corrected information.

Date:Tuesday 2 July 2013
Time:07:45 LT
Type:Silhouette image of generic A343 model; specific model in this crash may look slightly different    
Airbus A340-311
Owner/operator:SriLankan Airlines
Registration: 4R-ADA
MSN: 032
Year of manufacture:1994
Engine model:CFMI CFM56-5C2
Fatalities:Fatalities: 0 / Occupants: 330
Other fatalities:0
Aircraft damage: Minor
Category:Serious incident
Location:Colombo-Bandaranaike International Airport (CMB/VCBI) -   Sri Lanka
Phase: Landing
Nature:Passenger - Scheduled
Departure airport:Riyadh-King Khalid International Airport (RUH/OERK)
Destination airport:Colombo-Bandaranaike International Airport (CMB/VCBI)
Confidence Rating: Information verified through data from accident investigation authorities
SriLankan Airlines flight UL266, an Airbus A340-300, registration 4R-ADA departed Riyadh International Airport (RUH), Saudi Arabia for a flight to Colombo-Bandaranaike International Airport, Sri Lanka.
On approach the flight crew decided to conduct a practice auto landing on runway 22 and conducted the required briefing for an auto land which included task sharing, call outs and goaround strategy. The visibility conditions were good. UL266 then experienced a high sink rate during the flare, followed by a hard landing and a tail strike.

Probable Causes:
1. Hard landing
It was evident that the crew did not anticipate a hard landing as they did not detect the speed variation, which occurred at 105ft RA height and reached its maximum value at the touch down point.
The subsequent correction from the system to regain the target speed was completely diminished (negated) as the design features are incapable of adjusting the speed when the RETARD mode is engaged at 35ft as it solely depend on the RA input. In addition the prevailing local weather conditions were such that the longitudinal wind inversion and the tail wind gradient was beyond the limitation of the design. This scenario resulted in a hard landing with high pitch angle and with high vertical acceleration.
2. Tail strike
The tail strike may have resulted due to the hard landing or due to the involuntary control inputs at the time of hard landing and the subsequent control inputs given by PIC, which took the aircraft in to a higher pitch attitude when the oleos of the main wheels were compressed.

Accident investigation:
Investigating agency: 
Report number: 
Status: Investigation completed
Download report: Final report



Revision history:

23-Jul-2013 13:01 ryan Added
23-Jul-2013 17:03 harro Updated [Time, Aircraft type, Registration, Location, Source, Narrative]
21-Dec-2020 16:48 harro Updated [Time, Registration, Cn, Location, Departure airport, Destination airport, Narrative, Accident report]
26-Dec-2021 09:58 Ron Averes Updated [Operator]
31-Dec-2021 14:59 Prometheus Updated [Operator]
11-May-2024 06:22 Prometheus Updated [Damage]

Corrections or additions? ... Edit this accident description

The Aviation Safety Network is an exclusive service provided by:
Quick Links:

CONNECT WITH US: FSF on social media FSF Facebook FSF Twitter FSF Youtube FSF LinkedIn FSF Instagram

©2024 Flight Safety Foundation

1920 Ballenger Av, 4th Fl.
Alexandria, Virginia 22314